Getting rid of the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) would be a smart move economically, constitutionally and morally, according to Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul.
As Paul sees it, the concept of FEMA, not just its operation as a much maligned federal operation, is just plain wrong—because it means making taxpayers in one part of the country help pay for others who choose to live in dangerous areas.
“Why should somebody from the central part of the United States rebuild my house?” Paul said on CNN. “Why shouldn’t I have to buy my own insurance and protect about the potential dangers?”
He adds that it’s “a moral hazard” for the government to always take “care of us when we do dumb things. I’m trying to get people to not do dumb things.”
Besides, says Paul, FEMA or anything like it is not found in the U.S. Constitution, so why have it?
-Noel Brinkerhoff